Whether the Bar Council is an authority for the purpose of deciding qualification for admission to LL.B., 3 years and Integrated Law Course? And if so, rejection of admission of petitioners to law course for the non compliance of eligibility criteria is justified?
Vakalatnama; Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. Vs. M. Rajashekar [Karnataka High Court, 02-12-2016]
The Registry shall not ask for ‘no objection’ of the advocate already on record, to accept the vakalatnama filed by a new Advocate.
Lokayukta Act, 1984 (Karnataka) – Section 6 – Though the Lokayuktha is an independent statutory functionary, he can be removed from office by an order of the Governor, subject of course to the procedure prescribed under Section 6 of the KL Act. Lokayukta Act, 1984 (Karnataka) – Section 15(3) – Whether the Lokayuktha would be […]
Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016 – technological transport service provider, otherwise called “aggregator” – Held, An Aggregator is a canvasser. Therefore, the aggregator falls within the scope of Section 93 of the Act. Hence, the Aggregator Rules are legally framed under Section 93 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
ContentsSections 120-B, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal CodeCentral Bureau of Investigation and another v. Rajesh Gandhi and another, (1996) 11 SCC 253Sanjeev Rajendra Bhatt v. Union of India and others, (2016) 1 SCC 1i) Bharati Tamang v. Union of India and others, (2013) 15 SCC 578ii) Narmada Bai […]
The Karnataka High Court on Monday will decide AIADMK chief J. Jayalalithaa’s appeal against conviction and four years of jailing by a special court in Bengaluru in an 18-year-old disproportionate assets case. Justice CR Kumaraswamy will be delivering the judgement at 11 o’clock. The 67-year old Jayalalithaa need not be present in the court when the single judge bench […]